Some states do a much worse job than others of keeping their residents healthy and providing for high-quality, affordable health care when their residents need it. People usually live shorter, less healthy lives in these states than they might if they lived elsewhere.
In my last column, I described a new States for Your Health ranking, and examined the states that finished near the top.
This week, I want to look first at why Florida, ranked first in one of the seven indicators – per capita Medicare spending on non-institution-based services – only finished 30thoverall.
Florida’s doesn’t invest enough in public health and prevention. It is 36th among the states in the 2011 Kids Count rankings, and 37th in the 2011 Healthy State rankings. Children in poor environments for their health are more likely to develop both physical and mental illnesses as they age. Obesity, cancers, heart diseases, and mental illnesses are all expensive, and can cut decades from life expectancy.
Florida’s care quality rankings are much higher than its prevention rankings. It is 11thin the number of times its hospital programs made the U.S. News and World Report national rankings. These high quality programs are usually found in just a few hospitals in major cities, but this is the case in most states. It is 16th in nurse practitioners per 100,000 residents, and 19th best in keeping Medicaid nursing home and hospital spending under control.
Florida is, however, is near the bottom (45thplace) in the percentage of residents with private insurance. That hurts.
The ten lowest ranked states either score exceptionally low in the prevention or health care rankings, or consistently low across the board:
50. West Virginia. The lowest-ranked state isn’t at the bottom in any individual ranking. It is just near the bottom everywhere – 40th in the percentage of people with private insurance, 43rd in the Healthy State rankings, and 44th in Kids Count. It broke into the top half in only one ranking, the amount its Medicaid program spends on hospitals and nursing homes. Even that may not be such a good thing. While low Medicaid spending on institutions was considered positive in this ranking, it is also an indicator of low spending on health care in general.
49. Louisiana. Louisiana finished next-to-last in both the Healthy State and Kids Count rankings. That’s why it’s 49th here, too. On the other hand, it was 2ndin per capita community Medicare spending, and has some quality hospital programs. It clearly has assets on which to build.
48. Mississippi. Mississippi is last in the Kids Count and Healthy State rankings, and next to last in percentage of people with private insurance. However, it is in the top ten in community-based Medicare spending and in the number of nurse practitioners per 100,000. Both could contribute to a healthier state in the future.
47. Oklahoma. Oklahoma is in the bottom ten in nurse practitioners, Kids Count, and Healthy State rankings. It is also one of 18 states with no highly ranked hospital programs.
45t. Arkansas. Arkansas’s profile looks similar to some of the others at the bottom. It has low prevention ratings that bring down its overall ranking, but it is near the top in number of nurse practitioners and limiting Medicaid hospital and nursing home spending.
45t. Kentucky. Kentucky isn’t near to the bottom in any single indicator. It is just consistently weak across the board.
44. New Mexico. New Mexico is in last place in the percentage of people privately insured.
43. Nevada. Nevada is in last place in the number of nurse practitioners.
42. Alabama. Alabama ranks low in prevention and primary care rankings.
41. Montana. Montana is as high as 25th in the Healthy State rankings, but it lags in Kids Count and all of the health care rankings.
Two states finished last in individual rankings but did not make the bottom ten. South Dakota was at the bottom in community-based Medicare spending per capita, but ranked 29thoverall. New Jersey spent the most from its Medicaid program on hospital and nursing home care, but still finished 9th overall.
To see the complete rankings, click here.
If there is a bottom line, it is this. Despite our discouragement with our public health and health care systems in general, people in nearly every state have at least something for which to be thankful. And there will be better days ahead for all of us if policy leaders understand that we want them to do more for our health, not less.
Happy Thanksgiving!
No comments:
Post a Comment